Adept's inactive timer

[Ericrb 0]

INACTIVITY TIMER SET TO 4 WEEKS. VOTE CLOSED.

Adept list (16/16);

Basti96 - Active
DallinMinecraft - Active
diabolicalau - Active
Dr_TreeMan - Active
Herzition - Inactive
jorgepintobasto - Active
kazkepox - Inactive
Oherokon - Active
Sloth_Boy - Active
T513 - Inactive
Taia39 - Active
Tatta - Active
TheCraftsman - Inactive
Toddlo1972 -Active
Viviana123 - Active
xunkang - Inactive



[opinion]For me adept should be an active rank[/opinion]
I think we should demote inactive adepts to mason. By inactive, I mean people who are just leaving without any notice. The only way an adept could get away with inactivity is if they tell us they are going to be inactive for x days.

I'll make a poll, share your opinions, place your vote, etc.

I think 2 weeks of non-noticed inactivity is enough.

POST OR ELSE YOUR VOTE DOESN'T COUNT. I WANT TO KNOW WHO YOU GUYS VOTED FOR
If you don't wanna share your opinions, just write what you voted for.

[Pedobear 0]

I voted 3 weeks because people can forget they go on vacation, and most vacations you can forget are like 1-2 weeks

[Finnen 0]

kevinsweijen wrote:

I voted 3 weeks because people can forget they go on vacation, and most vacations you can forget are like 1-2 weeks

same reason

[Zhuge 0]

4 weeks = month month = good.

[Moufisto 0]

I agree with the above, their reasoning on this is sound.

3-4 weeks give or take.

[Sharok-allinthemined 0]

4 weeks, because it looks fair...

[DemonicD3 0]

I voted 4 weeks, should be enough time for anybody that's on vaca or taking a break from the game to get back (if they did not notify anybody about there dissapearance). If they decide to come back afterwards, well that's another discussion.

[11014GRF 0]

i voted 4 because i think thats reasonable.

[Pedobear 0]

well, we only need froggers and zellies vote now, GET ON YOU 2

[Ericrb 0]

kevinsweijen wrote:

well, we only need froggers and zellies vote now, GET ON YOU 2

They can't beat 4.

[Finnen 0]

I'd change my vote from 3 to 4 weeks, cause of the month tingy sounded good to me so.

[Pedobear 0]

so eric, time to demote some?

[DemonicD3 0]

Lol, basti came back just in time it seems. He must have psychic powers.

[Guest Snowy]

kevinsweijen wrote:

well, we only need froggers and zellies vote now, GET ON YOU 2

Oh gosh harsh. Anyways yeah four weeks to me sounds fair enough

[Moufisto 0]

hang on hang on.
these people don't know what's going on.

i think we should make this clear to them before we start demoting people on this basis, we only just worked this out now.

please, give them.. 3 days to a week to relog, and warn them however you can, whether it be by site or by email.

if we warn them, they can't hold much against us for demotion via the new rule.

[DemonicD3 0]

Moufisto wrote:

hang on hang on.
these people don't know what's going on.

i think we should make this clear to them before we start demoting people on this basis, we only just worked this out now.

please, give them.. 3 days to a week to relog, and warn them however you can, whether it be by site or by email.

if we warn them, they can't hold much against us for demotion via the new rule.

Does that apply to these two?

kazkepox - 19 weeks 1 day
xunkang - 13 weeks

[Ericrb 0]

Moufisto wrote:

hang on hang on.
these people don't know what's going on.

i think we should make this clear to them before we start demoting people on this basis, we only just worked this out now.

please, give them.. 3 days to a week to relog, and warn them however you can, whether it be by site or by email.

if we warn them, they can't hold much against us for demotion via the new rule.

Some of them aren't even registered here. And 19 weeks, you really thing they'll come back? No.

[Moufisto 0]

Psh it doesn't matter how long they've been away for, or who it is.
a fair warning is a fair warning.

whatever, it's ultimately up to you guys, but i seriously think a warning is in order despite who it is.

[Pedobear 0]

Im for repromoting when they rejoin, but I dont think any of them will join

[Finnen 0]

agreed

[Ericrb 0]

Moufisto wrote:

Psh it doesn't matter how long they've been away for, or who it is.
a fair warning is a fair warning.

whatever, it's ultimately up to you guys, but i seriously think a warning is in order despite who it is.

Ok sure. Find their e-mails and warn them.

[Moufisto 0]

Ericrb wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

Psh it doesn't matter how long they've been away for, or who it is.
a fair warning is a fair warning.

whatever, it's ultimately up to you guys, but i seriously think a warning is in order despite who it is.

Ok sure. Find their e-mails and warn them.

i forgot to mention, i cbf. maybe later.

*facepalms self*

[Sharok-allinthemined 0]

Admins can send an e-mail to all the users of this forum in a short amount of time...
We can use this to warn them?

[Pedobear 0]

Sharok wrote:

Admins can send an e-mail to all the users of this forum in a short amount of time...
We can use this to warn them?

sharok, you dirty little genius, GO4IT

[Moufisto 0]

kevinsweijen wrote:

Sharok wrote:

Admins can send an e-mail to all the users of this forum in a short amount of time...
We can use this to warn them?

sharok, you dirty little genius, GO4IT

Seconded kev!

[Ericrb 0]

Moufisto wrote:

kevinsweijen wrote:

Sharok wrote:

Admins can send an e-mail to all the users of this forum in a short amount of time...
We can use this to warn them?

sharok, you dirty little genius, GO4IT

Seconded kev!

I didn't think about that spam function.

[Moufisto 0]

Promoted DaHams to Adept.

If anyone has an issue with this speak now, if not hold your peace. XD

[DemonicD3 0]

No issue cept I've never seen DaHams before. Yesterday was my only encounter with him so I'm assuming hes fairly new? That would be a issue with me as that gave him no time to build any trust with anybody. Unless you all know him?
*EDIT* He's also got 40 hours? I thought the min was atleast 60. Hes also done zero moderating today. Never followed any novices around to check for griefing, even when no mod was around or as far as he was concerned. Checked with oherokon who's been on today with him and he said there was this griefer today that he thought DaHams was gunna check out and follow. He just built while this individual went on a griefer rampage on the server ti'll oher caught him. Perhaps tomorrow or other days may be different. So far has no intent to moderate the server.

[Ericrb 0]

Demoted. We MUST follow the rules even if we're Admins. If not, it's gonna be a total mess. I'll re-promote him at 60.

[Moufisto 0]

1. he has almost 50hrs from what i recall,
2. =| it's 60 req? whoops.
3. I've seen him on a lot. but this was when i was on more, so a month or go, give or take a few days.

and Eric, you know we always make exceptions to the rule, even small ones like this from time to time.

anyway, no complaints, bl for him

[DemonicD3 0]

I talked to him some more, he seems like a cool guy. You have to pretty much ask him to moderate though, he doesn't do it on his own. Perhaps if he changes that I'll vote yes when he reaches 60. Hes far to new though for me to vote anything.

[Ericrb 0]

Moufisto wrote:

1. he has almost 50hrs from what i recall,
2. =| it's 60 req? whoops.
3. I've seen him on a lot. but this was when i was on more, so a month or go, give or take a few days.

and Eric, you know we always make exceptions to the rule, even small ones like this from time to time.

anyway, no complaints, bl for him

Dude come on. I always followed the rule. Except for Demon... I had to make money, WHAT.

[Guest Snowy]

No offense to DaHams, but aren't there better choices for adept than him??

[DemonicD3 0]

「サボテン」 Ericacti wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

1. he has almost 50hrs from what i recall,
2. =| it's 60 req? whoops.
3. I've seen him on a lot. but this was when i was on more, so a month or go, give or take a few days.

and Eric, you know we always make exceptions to the rule, even small ones like this from time to time.

anyway, no complaints, bl for him

Dude come on. I always followed the rule. Except for Demon... I had to make money, WHAT.

Oh now you've gone and let the cat out of the bag. Now everybody is going to be offering you money for a promo. All those people I paid to silence too. You remember marty? Course you don't, had him taken care of because he was getting too nosey.

[Pedobear 0]

dahams is a good guy, but indeed, I'd rather have some more moderators, req is 60-80

[Moufisto 0]

DemonicD3 wrote:

I talked to him some more, he seems like a cool guy. You have to pretty much ask him to moderate though, he doesn't do it on his own. Perhaps if he changes that I'll vote yes when he reaches 60. Hes far to new though for me to vote anything.

I told him when i promoted him he didn't have to actively do it, only that he had to keep an eye out -.-'' <-- guilty as charged.

Zelda, there probably is. This was done on a whim, hence why i asked for objections.

[Pedobear 0]

Moufisto wrote:

DemonicD3 wrote:

I talked to him some more, he seems like a cool guy. You have to pretty much ask him to moderate though, he doesn't do it on his own. Perhaps if he changes that I'll vote yes when he reaches 60. Hes far to new though for me to vote anything.

I told him when i promoted him he didn't have to actively do it, only that he had to keep an eye out -.-'' <-- guilty as charged.

Zelda, there probably is. This was done on a whim, hence why i asked for objections AFTER I PROMOTED HIM TROLOLOLOL.

^
I added something there mouf

[Moufisto 0]

TROLOLOLOLOL

[Moufisto 0]

So how about R2D10?
what's everyones opinion on HUMMMMM?

[Pedobear 0]

Moufisto wrote:

So how about R2D10?
what's everyones opinion on HUMMMMM?

NO, HELL NO

caught him on minor griefing before, also said things were his while they werent
doesnt say ANYTHING,
NO, NO, NO I DIS

[Moufisto 0]

kevinsweijen wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

So how about R2D10?
what's everyones opinion on HUMMMMM?

NO, HELL NO

caught him on minor griefing before, also said things were his while they werent
doesnt say ANYTHING,
NO, NO, NO I DIS

K. ^.^

WHAT'S THAT? GIVE HIM EXPERT?

OKAYYYY =D


-----------------------------------------------------------
dw dw, he's goin' nowhere.

[Pedobear 0]

Moufisto wrote:

kevinsweijen wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

So how about R2D10?
what's everyones opinion on HUMMMMM?

NO, HELL NO

caught him on minor griefing before, also said things were his while they werent
doesnt say ANYTHING,
NO, NO, NO I DIS

K. ^.^

WHAT'S THAT? GIVE HIM EXPERT?

OKAYYYY =D


-----------------------------------------------------------
dw dw, he's goin' nowhere.

xD

[Ericrb 0]

kevinsweijen wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

kevinsweijen wrote:

Moufisto wrote:

So how about R2D10?
what's everyones opinion on HUMMMMM?

NO, HELL NO

caught him on minor griefing before, also said things were his while they werent
doesnt say ANYTHING,
NO, NO, NO I DIS

K. ^.^

WHAT'S THAT? GIVE HIM EXPERT?

OKAYYYY =D


-----------------------------------------------------------
dw dw, he's goin' nowhere.

xD

GOGOGOGOGO.