Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 NO, doom NOT for expert, I have problems with him, he's MOSTLY friendly, but not always, also, he got adept what, like 2 weeks ago? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Snowy Posted July 13, 2011 Care to share your problems with him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 I did, he is not always as nice as we want, also, he is too new Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Snowy Posted July 13, 2011 Well this topic is for suggestionsAny more? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Moufisto 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Zhuge wrote:Any idea as to who?..We get back in and NOW you want this sorted out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 I also remember something bout us promoting zellie to fix that....and I remember someone raging....hmmm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Moufisto 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Yeah I thought the same Kev,something smells of irony.EDIT:As for the topic at hand..Probably should break it down in four steps,Ask ourselves how many adepts we have,How many experts we have,How many hours our adepts have,and whether we trust them / have any issues with them.And in the first place, how many experts are we planning to promote?We've got z, me, kev, zelda and sharok in, it would seem.so 5 experts, how many are we going for? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 something smells of "Nobody will get a high rank except for me, so when the whole thing is fixed by adding some ranks (lolwut?) Im gonna try and do the EXACT same thing as was initially tried but what I screwed up"yes, that smell is awful Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Moufisto 0 Posted July 13, 2011 kevinsweijen wrote:I did, he is not always as nice as we want, also, he is too newAgreed, he's too new. though, I don't understand your issue with his niceness since we've got some asses among us, for instance, Me and - forgive me Eric; but I'm classifying you as one for this example too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zhuge 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Point is the adepts we have are hitting high hours. Some even asked for adept/expert this topic was going for a formal eval of our team and set up minimum reqs <.<. And yes most adepts are too new so proposal req 150h as adept minimum for expert consideration. And mouf is right lets list all and do a quad vote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Im not gonna base it on hours, I want less moufs, more Froggers (no offense), people that can ban players when needed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Moufisto 0 Posted July 13, 2011 kevinsweijen wrote:Im not gonna base it on hours, I want less moufs, more Froggers (no offense), people that can ban players when neededLess Moufs? People that can ban players when needed?The only proof we have that people have been committed to the server is by the hours,and commitment shown; none of us have been sure about the players so it's the second most reliable info that we can count on! the only part that lies left, is the trust and respect the community has towards that player, which is our current issue!Alright; If that's how it is, you run the show from here Kev. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zhuge 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Eagh. I guess i see how it goes *nyan nyan*Heh ok no more experts but i assume we use artisan to test adepts to be? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pedobear 0 Posted July 13, 2011 Zhuge wrote:Eagh. I guess i see how it goes *nyan nyan*Heh ok no more experts but i assume we use artisan to test adepts to be?yes, also mouf, with Moufs I ment those "asses" Im on IRC like 18-20 hours a day, so I see most players, how they act and react and such Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
