Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Pedobear

Members
  • Content Count

    457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pedobear


  1. SirDoom wrote:
    Gotta take into account that theres always possibility of his brother (benster) posing as him.

    Should we extend builder ranks abit further? As a method of consolidation to those who arent fit for adept, or those who dont want to moderate in the first place. Just slap a new color and bit higher cuboid limit. Could help prevent possible ragegriefs and quits.


    Doom.....Artisan was the rank for this.....it was never meant as a rankup-till rank, it was made for the loyal players that couldn't be trusted with adepts or who didn't want to moderate >_>

  2. masteronion wrote:
    Rookie1, Pupil1, Mason1, Adept1, etc. should all be flat maps, anyway. The names aren't very appealing because what are you going to name a flat map? I mean our first flat map for adepts was just named Flat!

    Generated worlds with actual terrain specific to that rank should be named, imo.


    this ^

  3. Adept isn't and shouldn't be based on hours, but on trust, moderation capability and a good attitude. (Now I'm wondering, how did Mouf get adept? :O jk, Ily)
    Although, I haven't really seen a lot of him/her/it/combinations of these 3.
    IMO we should wait a bit.
    ~Kevvy :3

  4. I don't really know why Hollow got adept....
    He's a great builder, that's for sure, but I've seen him through IRC a few times, never seen him warn/kick/ban or anything else........
    For Ph03b3: Yes, it seems that we need more Phoebe's in our staff :3

  5. *ahum*
    You can only use "(...) IS" when everyone on earth agrees that it is.
    What you mean is: "In my opinion, some things should be changed in the ranks. Isn't a draw limit of 32 a little small? If this has been discussed before, I'm sorry for bringing it up again, I wasn't aware."
    ~Kevinsweijen
    /trollface :3
×
×
  • Create New...